<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Karl Rove Working For The Clinton Campaign?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>benskull -

I predict you&#039;re going to love today&#039;s column.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>benskull -</p>
<p>I predict you're going to love today's column.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benskull</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>benskull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>and yes, her new offense tactics are unnattractive. The last debate was almost annoying, waiting for the bs to clear to actually hear their positions. Edwards was great. Patient, and far less drawn into the mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and yes, her new offense tactics are unnattractive. The last debate was almost annoying, waiting for the bs to clear to actually hear their positions. Edwards was great. Patient, and far less drawn into the mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benskull</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>benskull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>read the huff post about carter and Kennedy vs Nixon. Interesting. All were expecting a dem victory, with the incumbent pres and a strong Kennedy. They ended up killing each other with all their bickering, and both lost. Interesting comparison to obama/Clinton. My prediction, Hillary continues to engage obama in bs arguments,which kills both there runs, as I get the impression its doing, but thanks to Edwards sticking it out, regardless of the medias refusal to cover him, ends up the victor, as people forget about the bickersons and realize what good ideas he has and the fact that he would be strong against mccain or any of the other rep clowns, and in he goes. Fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read the huff post about carter and Kennedy vs Nixon. Interesting. All were expecting a dem victory, with the incumbent pres and a strong Kennedy. They ended up killing each other with all their bickering, and both lost. Interesting comparison to obama/Clinton. My prediction, Hillary continues to engage obama in bs arguments,which kills both there runs, as I get the impression its doing, but thanks to Edwards sticking it out, regardless of the medias refusal to cover him, ends up the victor, as people forget about the bickersons and realize what good ideas he has and the fact that he would be strong against mccain or any of the other rep clowns, and in he goes. Fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Michale -

It doesn&#039;t happen often, but here is a time I&#039;m in complete agreement with you!

It seems like both she and Obama are pushing &quot;change for change&#039;s sake&quot; which is, as you said, par for the course of any political campaign.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>It doesn't happen often, but here is a time I'm in complete agreement with you!</p>
<p>It seems like both she and Obama are pushing "change for change's sake" which is, as you said, par for the course of any political campaign.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/23/is-karl-rove-working-for-the-clinton-campaign/#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Here is the question I would like Mrs Clinton to answer.

&quot;Mrs Clinton.  You are on record as stating that you are the candidate for &quot;change&quot;.  Yet you are also on record as pooh-poohing the complaints leveled against your campaign for the negative attacks on your opponent.  You state that this is how primary campaigns are done and it&#039;s no big deal.

So, my question to you ma&#039;am is this.  If you run your campaign as &#039;same ol same ol&#039; because &quot;that&#039;s how campaigns are done&quot;, how are we to believe that you are the candidate for change??  How are we to believe that you will be the &quot;change&quot; President when you are, right now, the &quot;same ol same ol&quot; candidate??&quot;


That oughta clinch up her sphincter, eh??   :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the question I would like Mrs Clinton to answer.</p>
<p>"Mrs Clinton.  You are on record as stating that you are the candidate for "change".  Yet you are also on record as pooh-poohing the complaints leveled against your campaign for the negative attacks on your opponent.  You state that this is how primary campaigns are done and it's no big deal.</p>
<p>So, my question to you ma'am is this.  If you run your campaign as 'same ol same ol' because "that's how campaigns are done", how are we to believe that you are the candidate for change??  How are we to believe that you will be the "change" President when you are, right now, the "same ol same ol" candidate??"</p>
<p>That oughta clinch up her sphincter, eh??   :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
