<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Picks For Iowa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 04:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>I think you might be right about Edwards. Regardless of whether you&#039;re a Hillary or Obama supporter, your second choice is likely to be Edwards. Mostly because people will feel that if you&#039;re for Hillary, you&#039;re against Obama and vice versa. 

And somehow (though I&#039;m not quite sure how), second choice picks matter in this &quot;nothing halfway about the Iowa way to treat you&quot; caucus. 

But I&#039;m going to go out on a limb and pick Obama as the winner hoping that more young people turn out than expected because of the importance of the race. 

As for the Republican side, think it&#039;s going to be the strike-crossing (on the Leno show) Huckabee. In a last-minute jab Huckabee said: &quot;People are looking for a presidential candidate who reminds them more of the guy they work with rather than the guy that laid them off.&quot; 

Cheers
- Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might be right about Edwards. Regardless of whether you're a Hillary or Obama supporter, your second choice is likely to be Edwards. Mostly because people will feel that if you're for Hillary, you're against Obama and vice versa. </p>
<p>And somehow (though I'm not quite sure how), second choice picks matter in this "nothing halfway about the Iowa way to treat you" caucus. </p>
<p>But I'm going to go out on a limb and pick Obama as the winner hoping that more young people turn out than expected because of the importance of the race. </p>
<p>As for the Republican side, think it's going to be the strike-crossing (on the Leno show) Huckabee. In a last-minute jab Huckabee said: "People are looking for a presidential candidate who reminds them more of the guy they work with rather than the guy that laid them off." </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
- Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fstanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/#comment-1596</link>
		<dc:creator>fstanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/02/my-picks-for-iowa/#comment-1596</guid>
		<description>I really would like to see Edwards win in Iowa but I have no idea what will happen.  With all the bad weather and the time needed to caucus I think the turn-out will be low.  What this means for the candidates is hard to guess but I am hoping that it will mean more votes for Edwards.

Happy new year
...Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really would like to see Edwards win in Iowa but I have no idea what will happen.  With all the bad weather and the time needed to caucus I think the turn-out will be low.  What this means for the candidates is hard to guess but I am hoping that it will mean more votes for Edwards.</p>
<p>Happy new year<br />
...Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
