And the sign of a person who is so afraid of other people's opinions and that they might be right is evidenced by vicious and unwarranted personal attacks..

Be that as it may, I accept your concession that you have no logical or rational counter to my arguments and that you are completely mentally disarmed...

Yer dismissed...

Or, as QUEEN would say...

BOOM... BOOM... BOOM.... Another one bites the dust...

Michale.....

The sign of a certified idiot-whacko is one who asks rhetorical questions and answers himself on the following line.
Nuff said!

Of course not.. You would just rather be hysterical and bash Bush without the first clue as to what is going on..

Michale.....

Isn’t one freaking decider in 7 years enough for a lifetime? I don’t care if the primary candidate is Cindy Sheehan or Homer Simpson. Yes, with all due respect and credit to Nancy Pelosi for many good votes and solid budget work. However, when 70% of her contingency has made it abundantly clear that this whack-job of President and his administration’s lies and insane bad decisions can not go unanswered.

As for those republicans, now raising a pudgy finger of protest to hearing us continue to chant the “I-Word.) I suggest if they could find multiple articles of impeachment to raise up against our previous president because he lied to congress about where he misplaced his Havana Corona, then the buggering of the whole country by our current decider should not be cause for them to over-react with indignant incredulity.
Now Ms Pelosi, if you think these are only voices of the extreme left, then you’ve been watching too many Bill-O Shows.
The message is now loud and clear: Get the job done or get out of Dodge!

-spermwhale

As far as the budget bills go, it is better for the Democrats wait on these. The Republicans are chomping at the bit for the president to veto these bills which will help to shore up the Republican base. So having this battle in a more active news cycle is a good thing. This will allow the Democrats to get their points across without galvanizing the entire Republican base.

We were briefly treated to a story in the MSM about Nancy Pelosi and her husband being potentially involved in shady land deals in San Francisco. Whether this is true, or just another fake scandal by the GOP, the issue was broached in the media on May 10, 2007, and since that time Nancy Pelosi has been very quiet. By sheer coincidence, this "scandal" was trotted out the same month that President Bush vetoed the Iraq Supplemental Bill (May 1, 2007). But, the story hit the MSM, then faded quickly. In addition, SINCE that time, Pelosi has done NOTHING of substance.

Is there any history to support this? Sure.

We know that the warrantless wiretapping under President Bush started prior to 9/11. We know for a fact that all three of the top telecom companies turned over all records requested to the same government who spied on protest groups and elderly ladies who protested the war. The GOP cronies who found themselves in positions of power manufactured corruption charges against Democratic politicians. The NSA wasn't looking just looking for terrorists before 9/11 when they were wiretapping United Nations officials. So, why are we to believe that the NSA under the administration wasn't mining every Democratic politicians emails, telephone calls, and communications, to uncover and document corrupt practices? We already know blackmail is something this administration will use; they blackmailed countries into signing Bi-Lateral Immunity agreements prior to our invasion of Iraq.

So, what is to stop them from blackmailing Democrats in Congress whose own corrupt practices became known to them?

We now return you to your Oil company advertisement, already in progress.

In America, peasants are not only the point, they are the power.